Hi Ray, I will try to help you over the weekend. The same principle still applies here. Even though FTMO’s spread on US30 or Gold may be lower than IC Markets at certain times, the relative size of the spread compared to a very tight stop loss (e.g. 10 pips) will still have a significant impact on the accuracy of the calculated risk% %. This is simply because the calculation is based on the price distance between entry and stop loss, and if the spread is a significant fraction of that distance, the maths gets skewed.
Regarding future updates, the challenge isn't with the tool's logic itself but with the market mechanics. For minimal SL distances on high-volatility instruments, spread and slippage become dominant factors; no calculation can entirely “correct” this without making assumptions that might be misleading in live trading. The only way to get perfectly stable values in such cases would be to base the calculation on theoretical zero-spread pricing, but that would no longer reflect real-world execution risk.
In short, the tool will continue to work as designed for its primary purpose, medium to longer SL/TP trade planning, but scalping with ultra-tight stops on indices and metals will always produce some variation in the displayed risk %.
It's also worth noting that cTrader includes a built-in Risk & Reward tool, which uses the platform's own order and price data. If you haven't already, it might be helpful to compare the results from that tool with ClickAlgo when using very tight stop losses, as it will help confirm whether the variations you're seeing are due to market factors rather than the tool's calculations.